Can We Rely On Information Written In Dan Brown’s Books “deception Point”?
I am reading Dan Browns’ book: thrilling plot brings pleasure. However how reliable is this information and different facts cited there for example about the White House?
Related posts
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Because it was based on facts.
I believe that Dan Brown has done a lot of research that companies wouldn’t want him to get out to the media. However I think he twists and stretches the facts to inane proportions so they’re almost entirely fiction.
Everyone has a different opinion on the Dan Brown books.
One shouldn’t think of information in fiction as being real, that is why it is fiction.
you can’t ‘rely’ on fiction. true, he does have a michael moorish sort of style and there are probably some grains of truth in what he has written in all his books. maybe it’s a massive conspiracy???
The book is fiction, so why does it matter how accurate some of the points are?
Dan Brown is FICTION writer period. All this controversy about the Di Vinci code is ridiculous. Read and enjoy!
The “facts” about the White House are fiction-just like the book itself-a good read,well- researched but definitely embellished.Just like the Da Vinci code…a grain of fact on a beach of fantasy:
Don’t you mean grammar,Angel Blue?
why does EVERYBODY have to pick on Dan brown, analyse his every word, and find faults with his grammer? Cant we read a book just for the pleasure it gives?